06.12.2023.
On Religion and the Calamitous World
Eight Years Later, Sadly Nothing has Changed in this Speech
Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe
Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe
Volume 37 Issue 1 Article 6
1-2017
Vital Role of Religion in the Calamitous World of Today
Jovan Kovačić
Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree
Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Eastern European Studies Commons
Recommended Citation
Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 37 : Iss. 1 , Article 6.
This Article, Exploration, or Report is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox
University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe by an authorized
editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact arolfe@georgefox.edu.
1
VITAL ROLE OF RELIGION IN THE CALAMITOUS WORLD OF TODAY
By Jovan Kovačić
Jovan Kovačić is the co-Founder and president of East West Bridge, a member of the Executive
Committee of the Trilateral Commission and chairperson of the Serbian National Group of the
Trilateral Commission. A former international reporter, communications expert and policy
advisor, Kovačić was educated in British, Serbian and US schools, and has a M.A. in
communications and media management. He worked worldwide for decades as a war
correspondent for CNN, ABC, NPR, BBC and other major media outlets. He ended his award-
winning reporting career as a Reuter’s correspondent for ex-Yugoslavia covering several wars
from Slovenia in 1991 to Kosovo in 1998. He joined the Office of the High Representative to
Bosnia in 1998, as a political advisor in charge of reconstruction and negotiating the safe return
of thousands of refugees and DPs. He also played an active role in the pro-democracy movement
in Serbia.
Mr. President, Madame Chairperson, your Eminences, distinguished colleagues, dear friends,
It is truly a great pleasure, privilege and honor to speak in front of you today. The
symbolism of the venue is not lost to us—this is Macedonia, which has been for millennia an
inspiration and wellspring of great achievements in literature, philosophy, medicine, religion,
esoterica and many other fields. Many great ideas have been born here and went to captivate the
world and launch events which changed the face of history.
Is it not wonderful that we are discussing dialogue among religions and civilizations in
Bitola, a city that derives its name from the Old Church Slavonic word ь (obitěĺь,
meaning "monastery, cloister") as the city was formerly noted for its monastery.
This subject we are discussing over the weekend could not be more topical or important
than it is now. So permit me just at the start to present to you some of my views on the subject,
like bullet points for the ensuing debate. The views are purely mine and if someone has an issue
with them, then I apologize—I am solely to blame.
Throughout history, religion has been abused by rulers and now today’s politicians to
achieve their political, financial or territorial ambitions. It’s been said that religion is the opium
of the masses but permit me the audacity to amend this thought and say that in most cases,
religion is a facilitator for the ruling class—a tool for political means and keeping subjects under
control. But as far as the masses are concerned, without religion, they would be much poorer for
the lack of it in the spiritual, philosophical, moral and societal sense. A religious void would be a
disaster for mankind, a black hole in our conscience and system of social norms.
You will agree with me that despite all our dreams and aspirations and indeed devotion of
millions of exemplary people to improve standards of living, health care, education, human,
religious and all other rights, our planet seems to be a lot more dangerous and a twisted place
than decades ago.
Modern globalization and internet have given us a huge boost—knowledge from across
the globe is at our fingertips; countries thousands of miles apart are today figuratively and in
many aspects, close neighbors. The butterfly effect has never been more evident than today. So,
with all this huge knowledge at our disposal, why then aren’t we smarter, kinder to each other,
why there is still bias, bigotry and cruelty in the world? Instead of being wiser, I sometimes think
all this readily available information has made us only dumber.
There are 18 percent more hostilities today than in the same period last year which again
recorded an 80 percent increase in terrorist acts than the previous year. The figures for this year
are certainly going to be a lot worse and the East-West relations are in many ways at the all-time
low, on the brink of disaster. Some 200 people on the planet today enjoy riches bigger than the
combined wealth of close half of the world’s population.
Economies are shaky, democracy is showing glaring signs of need for serious tweaking to
meet the modern challenges, or perhaps plainly said, to mitigate the avarice and lack of
compassion by the ruling few and cease being their instrument.
The Old World Order is being torn down while despite all the wisdom at our fingertips
today, no one can truly say what and how will the new one look like. We have no genuine
safeguards in place, and we are still looking at our foes, real or perceived, through outdated and
distortive optics.
Even the EU system, the most advanced social order in the recorded history of mankind,
an economically sound system shared by half a billion people is being challenged, not to use a
more serious word, by some one million unarmed, cold, hungry and fretful refugees.
Are they treated well, can they quickly integrate, has the EU a ready-made and tailored
solution to their problems or a working idea how to integrate them into the new society? The
answer to each is, alas, a resounding no, despite all the best wishes. Compounding to the already
huge problem is the fact that individual governments of EU countries are now breaking ranks
with the adopted immigrant policies, such as they may be, and contributing to the cracks in EU’s
monolith edifice.
The worst is yet to come as despite all the preparations by the EU, Frontex activity and
millions of euros spent to protect borders, millions more are getting ready to come to Europe.
Where will these people go? Logically, they will gravitate to the districts populated by their
countrymen already living in Europe and hence those districts, for example—the council estates
which in most part are simply ghettos—will only grow—as will the problems.
They will face fear of the unknown in a new environment, fear for their loved ones, how
to make a living, whom to turn to for medical care under new secular circumstances, and suffer
from traumas of their escape from war zones. They will face dilemmas on how best to pursue
their worship and religious customs and rites, how to safeguard their already traumatized
children. Will their new home country be good to them or not, will they be deported back to the
horrors of war zones and atrocities?
Migrants bring significant economic and cultural benefits. Some newcomers are very
successful in the labor market and enjoy positive relations with other residents. But there is
substantial evidence that many face disadvantages on all the key indexes of integration: legal
rights, education, employment, criminal justice, health, living conditions, and civic participation.
Moreover, migrants and the second generation can be well integrated on one index (such as
intermarriage), but not on others (such as high unemployment).
To make matters worse, the immigrants face inclusion and integration issues clouded
over by alarmingly growing populism stemming from the fear of the unknown and selfishness—
which not only makes the already difficult lives of the immigrants even worse, to say the least,
but also poisons the home atmosphere and sows distrust and even hatred among the recipient
population. Public resentment of migrants and fear of differences leads to discrimination,
community tensions, and occasional violence. In addition, it has contributed to the steady rise in
support for far-right political parties, which successfully exploit people's fears and resentments.
The fear of the unknown or fear of losing their jobs to newcomers who will work for
less? A bit of both. On the other hand, an ominous 2013 poll by Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für
Sozialforschung alleges Islamic fundamentalism is widespread among European Moslems with
the majority saying religious rules are more important than civil laws. I can only hope these
figures are exaggerated, but either way this does not sit well with the increasingly secular
Europe.
This is where the religious leaders must step in. Imams and priests must assume the
mantle of responsibility not just for their flock, but all people in their environment, and talk
together and find ways of making the immigrants’ “landing” in Europe softer, and inclusion
easier and effective. Both the Islamic and Christian clerics must work on the solution together,
they must talk with each other, must become a vital cog in the solution and not stay on the
sidelines, pursue their narrow agendas and hence remain a part of the problem. They are perhaps
ideally suited today to reach across confessions and start a much-needed dialogue or discussion
on how to end the hostilities and rebuild trust among faiths, and then pass on workable ideas to
the local politicians to make necessary adjustment to immigrant policies. One does have to bear
in mind that one people can never be truly happy if others are suffering, so it’s in their best
interest to cooperate with one another.
It has been known to work in the past and even today—and permit me to use a wonderful
example of religious tolerance, understanding, trust and cooperation, when stakes are very high:
the keeper of the keys to the Basilica of the Holy Grave in Jerusalem, which involves six
Christian churches known for their spectacular arguments, some of which account for great
footage on YouTube, for more than 13 centuries is a Moslem family. This story obviously has
several morals.
Furthermore, many in the West tend to think that fundamentalism as a concept is
confined to Islam. It most certainly is not—it exists everywhere, in all societies and all religions.
I sincerely have, perhaps a pipe dream, but a dream nevertheless, in which responsible religious
leaders will take on the extremists in their respective societies. Simply put, even though it is the
task of security forces in Europe, for instance, to combat terrorism, who is better suited for the
task of uprooting it at the source than their own religious leaders? No one can do that better than
them. No one knows their flock’s problems better than them.
Because each extremist act, be it Moslem, Christian or whatever, brings shame and grief
to the rest of the vast majority of decent folks who have the right to pray and worship their God
as they should. Extremism shackles its own environment just as much as it wreaks havoc on
those whom it perceives as the infidel or enemy. Just look at Syria and Iraq today where
hundreds of thousands have died in a war with a pronounced religious component, albeit spurred
by geopolitical motives. Tens of millions of people have had their futures ruined, children left
with no prospects whatsoever. Just to illustrate what a world we live in today, allow me to point
out that 20,000 people, mostly infants from age one to five, die from starvation each and every
day, while at the same time, five billion dollars are spent that same day on armaments and
military needs. Need one to say anything more?
So, we have a colossal task ahead of us and it cannot wait. We must reach out to each
other and champion core values of mankind. Learn from one another and keep populists and
extremists at bay. It takes courage to take on the enemy but real heroism to take on one’s own.
Perseverance and commitment are the cornerstone of great deeds just as dialogue and
negotiations are quintessential to stability, peace and prosperity—always a much better
alternative to wars, unless you are an arms merchant.
Finally, we also must upgrade the word “tolerance.” Deep down, it does have a sinister
connotation. What we must now do is raise the bar and learn how to respect our mutual
differences, learn them and finally enjoy them because they bring diversity, new knowledge, new
vistas, they make us better and wiser people. This is not the question of “know thy enemy” but
instead “get to know your new friend better”. Once we get that into our heads, everything else
will be much easier.
Thank you for your kind attention.
OCCASIONAL PAPERS ON RELIGION IN EASTERN EUROPE (JANUARY 2017) XXXVII, 1